Choosing the Right Testing Method: A/B Testing vs. Split Testing vs. Multivariate Testing

Comparing and testing different elements of your website, from web forms to content and other interactive components, allows you to acknowledge areas that demand work and improvement. With the help of diligent testing methods – A/B testing, split testing, or multivariate testing, users can make data-driven decisions and enhance the overall user experience with targeted modifications.

Understanding A/B testing

A/B testing refers to the comparison between two versions of the same element to see which one appeals more to the users. The process of A/B testing involves a few crucial steps, such as:

  • Identifying the goals
  • Creating hypotheses
  • Developing variations
  • Selecting random but equal sample groups
  • Running the experiment 
  • Analyzing results 
  • Implementing the winning variant

For example, you want to test two variations of your CTA button with the final aim of achieving more sign-ups. So, in this case:

Version A (Control) - ‘Join us today

Version B (Variant) - ‘Sign up now

After running the tests on sample groups, you need to use statistical tools to understand which one of these versions has had the most impact on your audience. That will be your winning variant. 

Pros and cons of A/B testing

Pros:

  • A/B testing is definitive 
  • A/B testing is flexible
  • A/B is easy to implement

Cons:

  • You can only test one change at a time with A/B testing
  • A/B testing cannot improve the existing flaws
  • There are usually no real behavioral insights with A/B testing

Exploring split testing

In split testing, website traffic is distributed between two different versions of a webpage, which we refer to as Version A (the baseline) and Version B (the variant). Both these versions differ in terms of design, content structure, page elements, and so on. 

Conducting split testing involves evaluating how traffic groups respond to the version they are exposed to. The version offering the highest conversion rate is deemed the winner.

 

Pros and cons of split testing

Pros:

  • It allows testing bigger changes such as designs or layout of a website
  • You can make changes gradually
  • It is simple to analyze real, factual results through split testing

Cons:

  • It is usually extremely time-consuming
  • It does not solve any usability problems
  • It only works for specific goals

Delving into multivariate testing

Contrary to other testing techniques, in multivariate testing, you can modify and test multiple webpage elements to see which combination has the highest conversion optimization rate. This method is especially useful when you want to understand the impact of radical changes on a webpage instead of only testing the impact of one element. 

Multivariate testing usually produces much more subtle changes than A/B or split tests. It provides valuable insights into how key elements can work together to boost conversion rates. Therefore, if your goal is to optimize the landing page, home page, or any other crucial element of your website without undergoing a complete makeover, multivariate testing is the way to go. 

Pros and cons of multivariate testing

Pros:

  • Through multivariate testing, you can discover high-performing combinations that often get overlooked in simpler tests
  • It helps identify potential issues or pitfalls early on, thereby enabling businesses to make the necessary changes and ensure a seamless user experience
  • The comprehensive nature of multivariate testing reduces the need for subsequent tests, which means less utilization of resources

Cons:

  • Since multivariate testing involves multiple variables, it requires a large sample size
  • It involves complex analysis, which can often be overwhelming, without any specialized tools
  • It can produce results that are difficult to interpret

Comparing the test methods


Parameters A/B testing Split testing Multivariate testing
Basic concept This testing method compares a control version with various small, single changes to determine which performs better This method involves comparing a control version with a completely different version to see which one resonates better with site visitors This method involves testing multiple combinations of different web pages simultaneously 
Ideal usage  Best for websites with low to moderate traffic Best for websites with moderate to high amount of traffic Suitable for websites with higher traffic volumes
Sample size requirements Requires a small sample size as it focuses on comparing only two variants Usually demands a larger overall sample size Needs the largest sample size since numerous combinations are evaluated

Choosing the right methods for your needs

A/B testing, split testing, and multivariate testing – every method has its unique set of advantages and disadvantages. The key is to select the one that can potentially compel maximum advantage for your business goals.

For example, if you are looking to refine your current pages to achieve high conversion rate optimization, then A/B testing is your best choice. 

But if you want to test whole new pages on your site, then you should definitely stick with multivariate testing. In addition to this, you must also keep a close eye on your website traffic. If you are running a multivariate test on a website with low traffic, then the results produced will not be statistically significant.

Lastly, factor in the amount of resources required and the complexities involved in setting up these tests. While A/B tests are very easy to implement, the same cannot be said for multivariate testing, which requires specialized tools and knowledge. 

Best practices for implementing testing methods

Below are a few tips and tricks for setting up your choice of testing method to achieve the most effective results for conversion rate optimization.

  • Create a learning agenda to evaluate whether MVT is the best solution to your problem or whether A/B testing or split testing can be more suitable.
  • When testing, stick to variables that you believe will have a high impact on the conversion rate.
  • Understand the metrics you will use to measure success at the end of the test run.
  • Give your tests time since ending experiments early can lead to unreliable results.
  • Be mindful of the target you are sampling. They must be highly targeted, large, random, and even.

Conclusion

Implementing the right testing methods is not just about making changes—it's about making the right changes. Without testing, you might never realize your site's potential to convert more customers. Testing is especially crucial for B2B companies relying on leads and B2C brands selling directly online. By understanding the differences between the three different types of testing methods shared above, you can select the one that works best for your business goals.

Frequently asked questions

What is the primary difference between A/B testing and split testing?

One of the main differences between A/B testing and split testing lies in its implementation process. A/B testing is best for scenarios where you want to make smaller changes to a website. On the other hand, split testing is more useful for comparing two completely different versions and is used for making significant changes.

When should I use multivariate testing instead of A/B testing?

You may consider multivariate testing when several elements of a web page require improvement. For example, it may include a page with a sign-up form, some catchy header text, and a footer. This form of testing is often recommended for websites that have a significant daily high traffic.

How do I decide which testing method is right for my website?

First understand your goals, evaluate the traffic levels, and decipher resource availability to figure out which testing method is best for your website.